The Supreme Court recently ruled that in order for a later order, provision, or amendment to be regarded as clarifying an earlier provision, it must not broaden or change the original provision’s application, and the earlier provision must be sufficiently ambiguous or vague to call...
According to the Bombay High Court, the location of the arbitration cannot be determined only by the fact that the arbitral ruling was signed there. It further said that if the parties have not reached an agreement on the location of the arbitration and the...
In accordance with Section 121(r) of the Finance Act, 2019, the term “quantified” refers to a written communication of the amount of duty payable under an indirect tax enactment. According to the bench of Delhi High Court, a unilateral quantification by the petitioner does not...
The Director General of the Competition Commission of India (CCI) recently issued summonses to two senior officials, among them a Director of Shyam Steel Industries Ltd., in connection with the investigation being conducted into the alleged cartelization by steel manufacturers. The Calcutta High Court recently...
The Supreme Court has ruled that the issue of Approver being cross-examined as a witness in the Court of the Magistrate as required by Section 306 (4)(a) of the Code of Criminal Procedure does not arise when the Special Court elects to take cognizance directly...
Nulla vitae elit libero, a pharetra augue. Nulla vitae elit libero, a pharetra augue. Nulla vitae elit libero, a pharetra augue. Donec sed odio dui. Etiam porta sem malesuada.
Recent Comments